The second half of this video addresses the benefits of legalizing drugs on the violence in Latin America. The point that prohibition only tends towards more violence created by a fight for market share by the various underground organizations in the black market is certainly a legitimate point that should be enough to convince any reasonable person to support drug legalization in the United States or America. There is, however, an even more fundamental reason to support such a policy: Freedom. Every individual has a property right in their person, this means no other can control another’s body, whether it be an individual or a group of people who call themselves a government, to do so would be a form of slavery. It then follows that no law can be legitimate which says to an individual that they cannot put certain things in their body, as the government does not own any individuals body. Therefore the consumption of any drug, no matter how harmful it may be, is the right of the individual and cannot be infringed. This is what we call freedom, and until the government gets out of the business of making slaves of its subjects it cannot claim to be the land of the free.
Related Articles
Eliot Spitzer and Sophistry
Posted on Author Glaucon
In Ancient Greece sophists were teachers who taught virtue, which in those days generally meant the art of statesmanship, to young men rich enough to afford their services. Sophistry, as their art was called, is a trade much criticized in the dialogues of Plato, where Socrates attacks not only the practice of teaching for a […]
“America’s Egypt Problem” by Jack Hunter
Posted on Author Lysander
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Qm8eFTgddY&feature=feedu
Government and the Environment: a Role to Play?
Posted on Author Sean Dempsey
In response to the anarachist or anarcho-capitalist argument that the government must take no role in environmental protectionism or defense of nature–that the free market will do it for us. And to attempt so is amoral if/when no property rights are infringed upon. So fundamentally here is a logical concern I have with the “anarchist […]